Over 1.5 Million International FOLLOWERS AND Readers have engaged our various digests and blogs providing insights on the "SEVEN BIG Es" - Earth, Economics, Environment, Energy, Exponentiation, Entropy, and Extinction, curated by our world renowned "Quantum Realonomist" - First Financial Insights Inc. - Dr. Peter G Kinesa
WORLD LEADING INSIGHTS
International LEADERS Calling Market Crashes Years Ahead
Second to None, Anywhere...
'Warned 2000 tech slide; predicted 2008 meltdown in 2007. Forecasted 2020 global economic collapse in 2011, AND NOW- BY 2050 - THE MOTHER OF ALL CRASHES"
(io9) – The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report warned
that more intense droughts and heat waves will cause famine and water
shortages. But, don't worry! Yesterday, the GOP held a hearing to tell
us the IPCC is, in fact, a global conspiracy to control our lives and "redistribute wealth among nations." [Archived webcast]
GOP at Work???
The hearing,
titled "Examining the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Process," was convened by the House Committee on Science, Space and
Technology—the same folks who recently demonstrated their inability to grasp the idea that the world's climate varies across different regions and who informed us that warmer weather didn't bother the dinosaurs, so what's all the fuss about?
GOP Intellectual Discourse?
In
principle, there's nothing wrong with assessing the methodology of such
an important and influential report. But, in one of those
quintessential moments of Washington double-think, Chairman Lamar Smith
(R-TX)—who accuses the IPCC of creating data to serve a predetermined
political agenda—summarized the hearing's conclusions a day before it
even began. "The IPCC does not perform science itself and doesn't
monitor the climate," Smith told a reporter, "but only reviews carefully selected scientific literature."
So, small wonder that Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), the ranking Democrat on the committee, offered the opinion:
Take me to your leader. Who? That's what I asked?
While
the topic of today's hearing is a legitimate one, namely, how the IPCC
process can be improved, I am concerned that the real objective of this
hearing is to try to undercut the IPCC and to cast doubt on the validity
of climate change research.