Over 1.5 Million International FOLLOWERS AND Readers have engaged our various digests and blogs providing insights on the "SEVEN BIG Es" - Earth, Economics, Environment, Energy, Exponentiation, Entropy, and Extinction, curated by our world renowned "Quantum Realonomist" - First Financial Insights Inc. - Dr. Peter G Kinesa
WORLD LEADING INSIGHTS
International LEADERS Calling Market Crashes Years Ahead
Second to None, Anywhere...
'Warned 2000 tech slide; predicted 2008 meltdown in 2007. Forecasted 2020 global economic collapse in 2011, AND NOW- BY 2050 - THE MOTHER OF ALL CRASHES"
Russia’s attack on Ukraine represents a demand for a new world order that, over the long term, will support higher prices for fossil fuels, especially oil. Such an economy would probably be centered on Russia and China. The rest of the world economy, to the extent that it continues to exist, will largely have to get along without fossil fuels, other than the fossil fuels that countries continue to produce for themselves. Population and living standards will fall in most of the world.
If a Russia-and-China-centric economy can be developed, the US dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency. Trade will be in the currency of the new Russia-China block. Outside of this block, local currencies will play a dominant role. Most of today’s debt will ultimately be defaulted upon; to the extent that this debt is replaced, it will be replaced with debt in local currencies.
As I see the situation, the underlying problem is the fact that, on a world basis, energy consumption per capita is shrinking. Energy consumption is essential for creating goods and services.
Figure 1. The Energy of various types is used to transform raw materials (that is resources) into finished products.
The shrinking amount of energy per person means that, on average, fewer and fewer finished goods and services can be produced for each person. Some countries do better than average; others do worse. With low fossil fuel prices, Russia has been faring worse than average; it wants to remedy the situation with long-term higher energy prices. If Russia can start transferring its energy exports to China, perhaps the new Russia-China economy, with limited support from the rest of the world, can afford to pay Russia the high prices for fossil fuels that Russia requires to maintain its economy.
Utter trash, which demonstrates how out of touch - those who research and study economics, create new social/economic and political theories - are with the realities of this planet. They premise their thinking on the idea that we need and can grow economically forever but fail to appreciate that we live under the governing physical and mathematical constraints of a finite planet that is now also diseased by many ecological, resource and climate maladies that are together leading us to civilised and economic collapse by 2040 as calculated by competent, unbiased MIT researchers - among others- in the best selling book - The Limits to Growth, in 1972.
The end result - if an Arctic BOE (Blue Ocean Event)or another massive event does not get us first - then the extinction of the species and most other forms of life on the planet is reasonably probable in the near term.
Given the current global economic situations, we are well on target to meet this 2040 date as hyperinflation, pandemics, resource exhaustion, global warming, food/energy shortages, nuclear threats, national collapses, social unrest, currency/ stock panics, anarchy and more problems are evidenced everywhere - just as predicted by MIT researchers and other competent, professional scholars and mathematicians since the early 70s. , To sum up, the author likely wrote this fairytale while visiting Disney Land and was perhaps also under the influence of some unknown externalities - for there is nothing in this propaganda that can help to reverse the path we are on - save an adverse worldwide event that substantially reduces the human population in a decade or so that would then rebalance the number of our species back to what remains of our various key resource quantities. That event is nearly impossible to effect without wiping out the habitat.
Why do so-called economists attempt such pitiful undertakings when the hard facts and honest numbers indicate there are only enough non-renewable resources (oil, natural gas, copper, etc.) and arable lands to last humanity 20- 50 years? Who do they think they are kidding? The Invisible Hand? Are they insane?
Anyway if you want to entertain yourself with the musings of a bankrupt and disillusioned profession that still operates with and under the historic archaic theories of Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Paul Samuelson, et al - this may be just the childrens' storybook you have been looking for - a real stinker!
Too bad so much time and resources have been wasted here -as ironically it could have been applied more diligently, wisely and creatively - considering the real numeric constraints and short timelines we have before us.